Efficacy of Differentiated Instruction and Conventional Methods on Low Achievers’ Interest in Learning and Gender

Authors

  • Dominic Solomon Ojonugwa University of Nigeria
  • Janet Ngozi Igbo University of Nigeria
  • Hosea Abalaka Apeh University of Abuja
  • Eric Chima Ndukwu University of Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18034/ra.v8i3.489

Keywords:

Interest, Mathematics, Achievement, Low achievers, Differentiated instruction, Gender

Abstract

The need to seek for innovative teaching methods to enhance the interest of mathematics low achievers necessitated this study. This study examined the effect of differentiated instruction on low achievers’ interest in mathematics based on gender. The sample size for the study consists of 66 males and 80 females identified mathematics low achievers. The researchers used multi-stage sampling technique. Mathematics Interest Rating Scale was the instrument used in collecting data. The pre-test and post-test data were analyzed using mean, standard deviations and Analysis of Covariance.  Results revealed that the use of differentiated instruction in teaching mathematics low achievers in primary school increased their interest in mathematics than conventional method. Influence of gender on interest of mathematics low achievers is significant. The interaction effect of instructional strategies and gender on mathematics interest of low achievers is not significant. The study provided empirical evidence that differentiated instruction acted as valuable tool for enhancing interest and achievement in mathematics therefore, researchers may benefit from the outcome of this article for further research. The data could serve as reference point for empirical study. Curriculum designers and text books authors may include information on the method in children’s’ text book.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dominic Solomon Ojonugwa, University of Nigeria

Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria

Janet Ngozi Igbo, University of Nigeria

Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria

Hosea Abalaka Apeh, University of Abuja

Faculty of Education, University of Abuja

Eric Chima Ndukwu, University of Nigeria

Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria

References

Acho, E.E., Imoko, I. & Ajai, J.T. (2013). Sex differential in students’ achievement and interest in geometry using game and stimulation techniques. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1) 78-92.

Ascher, C. (2016). Improving the mathematical skills of low achievers. ERIC/UUE Fast Sheet Number 18. ERIC Clearing house on Urban Education, New York.

Alavinia, P. & Farhady, S. (2012). Using differentiated instruction to teach vocabulary in mixed ability classes with a focus on multiple intelligences and learning styles. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology 2(4), 72-82

Aluko,K.O. (2008). Teaching chemistry in secondary schools: A case for cooperative institutional strategy. Ethi-opia Journal of Education and Science, 3(2). Retrieved from www.ajol.info retrieved on 2/8/2017.

Carlson, M. (2015). What is differentiated instruction? Examples, definition and Activity Study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-di. A student paper submitted to University of Sunderland Re-trieved on 20/6/18.

Chavan, D. K. (2016). Development of mathematics interest enhancement program for student teachers and study its effectiveness. Retrieved on 23/8/2017 from dipakchavansir@yahoo.co.in

Chen, A, (2011). A theoretical conceptualization for motivation research in physical education: An Integrated perspective. Quest, 53. Retrieved from digilib.unimed.ac.id on 9/5/2017

Chilwant,K.S. (2012). Comparison of two teaching methods structured interactive lectures and conventional lectures. Biomedical Research 23(3). Retrieved from biomedres.org on 17/8/2017

Frenzel, A. C. Goetz, M. T., Pekrun, R. & Watt, H.M.G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adoles-cence: influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20 (2), 208-231.

Ganyaupfu,E.M. (2013).Teaching methods and students’ academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Intervention. 2(9). Retrieved from www.ijhssi.org on 27/12/2017.

Ihenko, G.G (2017). Influence of gender on interest and academic achievement of students in integrated science in Obio Akpor local government area of Rivers State. European Scientific Journal. 13, (10), 272-279.

Ihedioha, S.A. (2012). Effectiveness of transmitter of knowledge and conventional teaching models on second-ary school students’ achievement on circle geometry and trigonometry. General Mathematics Notes, 12, 1. Retrieved from www.unesco-iicba.org on 7/8/2017

Ivowi, U. (2011). Role of Teachers in Motivating Students' Interest in Science and Mathematics. Newsletter of international institute for capacity building in Africa.3(1). Retrieved from www.unesco-iicba.org on 5/9/2017

Khayati, S & Payan, A. (2014). Effective factors increasing the students’ interest in mathematics in the opinion of mathematic teachers of Zahedan World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology. Interna-tional Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 8(9), 3077-3085.

Kiptim,K.J.Rono, P.K.,Too, J.K, Bill, B.K. & Too, K.J. (2013). Effect of students’ gender on mathematics per-formance in primary school in Keiyo south district, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2, (6). Retrieved from www.ijstr,org on 25/8/2017

Knewton, N. (2014). Differentiated Instruction & Adaptive Learning. https:// www.knewton. Com/resources/blog/education-infographics/differentiated-instruction-adaptive-learning/Retrived on 15/5/2018

Koeze, P.A. (2007). Differentiated Instruction: The effect on student achievement in an elementary school. Master’s thesis, Eastern Michigan University.

Kpolovie, P.J, Joe, A. I. and Okoto, T. (2014). Academic achievement prediction: Role of interest in learning and attitude towards School. Student paper submitted to intercollege International Journal of Humani-ties Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) 1(11), 73-100.

Lazardes, R. Ittel, A. (2012). Mathematics interest and achievement: what role does perceive parent and teacher support play? A longitudinal analysis. Student paper submitted to University Teknologi MARA Interna-tional Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3). 208-231.

Lee,Y.J. Hui C. & Chen, C. (2011). The influences of interest in learning and learning hours on learning outcomes of vocational college students in Taiwan: using a teacher’s instructional attitude as the moderator, Global Journal of Engineering Education 13(3), 140- 153.

Mardianto,D.& Wijaya,E.L.(2016).The effect of contextual teaching and learning and conventional method on math matics thinking ability of Islamic senior high school students’ in Medan. International Refereed Research Journal, 4(1), 92-99

Michelsen, C. (2016). Students´ interests and interdisciplinary instruction in mathematics and science center for science and mathematics. Education University of Southern Denmark www. imada. sdu.dk/ ~cmic Re-trieved from imada.sdu.dk on 17/8/16.

Mulder, Q. (2014). The effects of differentiated instruction on students’ mathematics achievement in primary school classrooms. Published Master Thesis. University of Twente. Retrieved from essay.utwente.nl on 3/4/2018

Nureni, L.,Omotayo,T,& Salaudeen,M.B.(2016). Comparison of the effects of guided discovery, problem solving and conventional teaching methods on retention of secondary school chemistry students in Minna me-tropolis, Niger State. The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences, 1, (2). Re-trieved from www.american-jiras.com on 25/6/2017.

Okpole,S.A.(2016). Mathematics low achievers. Confluence Educators Journal. 2(1), 4-12

Paul, S. (2011). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psy-chology, (5), 270-290.

Robb, L. (2015). What Is differentiated instruction? http://www.scholastic.com/ teachers/article /what-differentiated-instruction/ Retrieved 19/8/16

Schiefele, U. (2011). Interest, learning, and motivation first published in: Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 299-323. Retrieved from www.tandfonline.com on 4/7/2017

Shofoyeke,A.D. (2016). The impact of teaching methods on pre-primary school pupils’ learning interest and achievement in protection issues in selected nursery and primary schools in Ondo West Local Govern-ment. Journal of Elementary Education, 25, (2). Retrieved from pu.edu.pk on 4/7/2017

Shuchi, A. (2017). Conventional versus modern: role of information technology in improving teaching pedagog-ies. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2017- 4th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities 10-12 July 2017- Dubai, UAE.

Silvia, P. J. (2011). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5, pp.270-290. Retrieved from libres.uncg.edu on 23/1/2017

Socian, D. A. (2017). Conventional method of teaching. Conference Paper of 4thInternational Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities 10-12 July 2017- Dubai.

Subramaniam, P. R. (2016). Motivational Effects of interest on student engagement and learning in Physical Education: A Review. International Journal of Physics Education, 46(2), 11-19.

Thomas, M. Simonette, G. & Ramsook, L. (2013). The impact of differentiated instruction in a teacher educa-tion setting: successes and challenges. International Journal of Higher Education 2(3), 28-40.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2015). What is differentiated instruction Retrieved fromhttp://www. reading r ock-ets.org/article/what-differentiated-instruction Retrieved from teachthought.com on 15/3/15

Yew, H.L. Yap, S.F. & Tay, E.G. (2013). Four factors to consider in helping low achievers in mathematics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572937.pdf Retrieved on 21/3/2018.

--0--

Downloads

Published

2020-10-03

How to Cite

Ojonugwa, D. S. ., Igbo, J. N. ., Apeh, H. A. ., & Ndukwu, E. C. . (2020). Efficacy of Differentiated Instruction and Conventional Methods on Low Achievers’ Interest in Learning and Gender . ABC Research Alert, 8(3), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.18034/ra.v8i3.489