Article Retracted

The Role of Implementation of IDSR Strategy on Indicators of the Core and Supportive Surveillance Functions at the Head of Localities

Authors

  • S.M. H Himat Federal Ministry of Health
  • A .AE Hasab Alexandria University
  • E.A.B Abukaraig Alexandria University
  • M.A Abdalmajed Khartoum State Malaria Control Program
  • B.A. Abdalkarim Khartoum State Malaria Control Program

Keywords:

Communicable Diseases Surveillance, IDS, Kassala State

Abstract

Background: Disease surveillance is a cornerstone of outbreak detection and control. The evaluation of a disease surveillance system is important to ensure its performance over time.

Objectives: The role of implementation; of IDSR strategy on indicators of the core and supportive surveillance functions at the head of localities.

Materials and methods: An intervention approach (one group pre-test post-test design) was conducted and baseline data of communicable diseases surveillance was obtained from selected Kassala state, four localities, and 60 health facilities. After implementing an integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) strategy for six months to evaluate core and support functions. The same questionnaire (WHO- guided modified and tested questionnaire) that was used in the baseline was applied.

Results: The study showed that indicators of the supportive at the head of locality was improved at the head of four localities in terms of standards and guidelines, training, supervision and resources which witnessed significant improvement during pre and post intervention more than 90%.

Conclusion: Improvements in indicators of core and support functions at the locality and state levels are inextricably linked to the quality of activities carried out at health facility levels. This was noticed when the value of intervention-supported functions increased, which may also be justified by the technique of computation technique, which is based on the aggregate of indicators of health facilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • S.M. H Himat, Federal Ministry of Health

    Epidemiology Consultant (BSc, MPH (Public Health), PhD (Public Health Signficantly Epidemiology). Federal Ministry of Health.

  • A .AE Hasab, Alexandria University

    Professor of Epidemiology Department of Epidemiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University

  • E.A.B Abukaraig, Alexandria University

    Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Alexandria University

  • M.A Abdalmajed, Khartoum State Malaria Control Program

    Senior Public Health Specialists, Khartoum State Malaria Control Program

  • B.A. Abdalkarim, Khartoum State Malaria Control Program

    Senior Public Health Specialists, Khartoum State Malaria Control Program

References

Adokiya MN, Awoonor-williams JK, Beiersmann C, Müller O. Evaluation of the reporting completeness and timeliness of the integrated disease surveillance and response system in northern Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2016;50(1):3–8.

Dairo MD, Bamidele JO, Adebimpe WO. Disease surveillance and reporting in two southwestern states in Nige-ria: logistic challenges and prospects. J Public Heal Epidemiol. 2010;2:125–129.

Gueye D, Banke K, Mmbuji P. Follow-up monitoring and evaluation of integrated disease surveillance and re-sponse in Tanzania. Bethesda: The Partners for Health Reformplus Project, Abt Associates Inc.; 2006.

Joseph T-S, Id W, Kagoli M, Kaasbøll JJ, Aksel BG. Integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Ma-lawi: implementation gaps and challenges for timely alert. Plos One. 2018;13(11):e0200858.

Mandyata CB, Olowski LK, Mutale W. Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and re-sponse strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):746.

Nsubuga P, Brown WG, Groseclose SL, Ahadzie L, Talisuna AO, Mmbuji P, Tshimanga M, Midzi S, Wurapa F, Bazeyo W, Amri M, Trostle M, White M. Implementing integrated disease surveillance and re-sponse: four African countries’ experience 1998-2005. Glob Public Health. 2010;5(4):364–380.

Nsubuga P, Nwanyanwu O, Nkengasong JN, Mukanga D, Trostle M. Strengthening public health surveil-lance and response using the health systems strengthening agenda in developing countries. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(Suppl 1):S5.

Phalkey RK, Shukla S, Shardul S, Ashtekar N, Valsa S, Awate P, et al. Assessment of the core and support functions of the integrated disease surveillance system in Maharashtra, India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13.

Phalkey RK, Yamamoto S, Awate P, Marx M. Challenges with the implementing of an integrated disease sur-veillance and response (IDSR) system: systematic review of the lessons learned. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(1):131–143.

Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 4th ed. Duxbury Press; 1995. Page mtest http://www.sample-size.net/sample-size-study-paired-t-test.

World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Technical guidelines for integrated disease surveillance and response in the African region. 2. Congo, Brazzaville and Atlanta: WHO Re-gional Office for Africa and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.

World Health Organization RO for A. Guide for the Introduction of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in the Curricula of Health Training Institutions in the WHO African Region. Congo Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa; 2015.

--0--

Published

15-10-2022

How to Cite

Himat, S. H. ., Hasab, A. .AE ., Abukaraig, . E. ., Abdalmajed, M. ., & Abdalkarim, B. . (2022). Article Retracted: The Role of Implementation of IDSR Strategy on Indicators of the Core and Supportive Surveillance Functions at the Head of Localities. ABC Research Alert, 10(3), 37-44. https://abcresearchalert.com/article/view/630

Similar Articles

11-20 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.